Yes, we have just made a breakthrough that appears to have some potential for breaking the back of the IRS.

Is this major??

Is this historic??

Time and diligence will tell.

After many decades, we finally got the KING COUNTY (The largest County in Washington) RECORDER's Office to change its filing policy of "Notice of Federal Tax Lien" (NFTL) from being filed in a Tax Lien Index to being filed in a file entitled "Federal Tax Lien--Notice of" -- being done on Aug 7 or 8, 2006!

This evidently means that, according to one escrow company who informed a house-seller last week that "Hey, We found that there is this IRS Lien on your property!" to reporting this Tuesday, Aug 8, "We found there is NO lien on your property, just a notice of lien! - there is no encumbrance after all. You are free to close!", that All the 100,000's of NFTL's on file in King County Records are no longer considered as negotiable lien instruments, but mere notices = pieces of paper, giving knowledge of the existence of a specific lien (where we cannot find an actual IRS lien instrument).

Also, I just granted an interview to be on a TV show at 11 AM Monday, "Traveller in Seattle" On SCAN TV. A good half-hour summary.

(And, Be sure to watch at 9 PM Monday for Part II of Alex Jones' "Terror-Storm" which will shed light on the current Heathrow flights fiasco!!!

Watch me on Call 4Investigation -- about 40 minutes in, I briefly mention this lien change ? I found out just before going to the studio for taping on Tues. 9 PM pacific Friday)

Anyway, we are now working on several fronts to maximize the effect of this new recording policy which was done "In response to a customer's request for clarification, I instructed staff to change..." see attached August 10, Letter.

Read it carefully as you can see by the County recorder's careful wording she is trying to minimize the profound legal effect this correction in filing signifies -- trying to keep a lid on a billion dollar boondoggle. How can she say that "This 'minor' change to the document legal description...does not affect any recorded documents or official public records."??

The documents that were filed in the Federal Tax Lien Index as negotiable tax liens [Federal Tax Lien(s)] that were used to seize property, are now being filed as "Federal Tax Lien--Notice of" meaning they are now a "Notice of Federal Tax Lien", just as the caption states on the NFTL that the County Recorder receives, another public notice/announcement.

In her August 10, 2006 Notice is the Recorder trying NOT to confess or admit the fact that for many decades all NFTL filings have been "mis-described"?

If there was no need for clarification, why did the Recorder "instruct(ed) staff to change the (legal) description of the term "from federal tax lien" to "federal tax lien- notice of".

What legal ramifications would occur if the recorder now, because of inquiries, decides to change it back??

Has this mis-filing caused anyone any problems??

The opportunity is here and now -- timing is everything. We have re-formed a Steering Committee to direct actions for maximum impact. We are going to follow-up with the Recorder, the Sheriff, the County Exec and County Counsel, State Auditor and Sec'y of State. (Anyone else?) Getting claims ready for Risk Management.

We are working on a Press Release. Notify County residents. We hope to grease the skids to make it easy for people in every other county and State to replicate our success and get this descriptive change implemented in their county - to cripple the IRS.

We appreciate and need any input you might have.

(Don't try to fight the IRS Octopus by yourself -- we learned from Glen Stoll.) We are just into the formulating stages - not sure what a fair donation would be. If you would like a copy of the paperwork (electronically &/or paper) we procured and manipulated to accomplish this feat, along with some direction on how you can replicate our success, a donation would be greatly appreciated (as all this did not happen without a price and sacrifice) Share this message with anyone you know who has had an IRS NFTL experience!

First come, first served:

Pastor Don

J & D Consultants International Ministries c/o 12345 lake City Way N.E. # 133 Seattle, (98125) Washington

A key Question:

Was the King County Recorder in possession of, or can the recorder provide the location of an actual valid, lawfully certified lien, as required by 26 USC §6323(f)(4)(B) which states in pertinent part:

...if--there is maintained "an adequate system for the indexing of Federal tax liens" then the notice of lien shall not be treated as meeting the filing requirements "unless the fact of filing is entered and recorded in the index" in such a manner that a reasonable inspection of the index will reveal the existence of the lien.?

6323(f)(4)(A) clarifies that a "Notice" equals "Knowledge of" the existence of such (deed).

What could this mean?

For the people of King County: it means that no King County resident has a Federal Tax Lien on File in King County Records -- only a Notice of. We are working to get proper commercial paperwork developed so that all people who have had property seized, wages garnished, bank accounts cleaned, pensions attached, etc can gain some remedy to get $omething back - hopefully, plus interest and with treble damages for the anguish being unlawfully liened/levy has caused.

Could this mean financial freedom?

For the Recorder/County: Will the county have any liability for decades of bureaucratic mis-filings -- could such a long-standing "mis-practice" bankrupt the county?

For the IRS: could this mean that the IRS has lost its Tax Lien Index so that their Notice is only a notice? Has the IRS lost its bite? Has the IRS lien/notice/index collusive securities fraud been exposed and castrated--rendered impotent?

Will the IRS have to resort to actually following lawful due process procedures to have liens adjudicated to become perfected and enforceable?

The Administrative Procedures Act (APA), *5 USC 556 (d) states in part:

"A sanction may not be imposed or rule or order issued except on consideration of the whole record or those parts thereof cited by a party and supported by and in accordance with the reliable, probative, and substantial evidence." Could this mean the end of IRS tyranny?

For Bankers/ Employers:

A Bankers liability is under 26 CFR Part 301.6332-1(c), which states in part:

"... Any person who mistakenly surrenders to the United States property or rights to property not properly subject to levy is not relieved from liability to a third party who owns the property ...."

For Tax Attorneys/ Tax Services: BYE BYE(?) = No more Offers in Compromise where you might PAY 50 cents on the dollar-- without a lien there is nothing you need to compromise -- go for COLLECTING / recovering all damages they caused You!!

For those Tax Honesty Heroes who have been shot with their own Silver Bullet and are serving terms: we may have found the ?Monopoly Game? pass key for a "Get outa Jail" card. This will take some work, however.

Will you still need to file??? ? (while I would not recommend you change your filing status without purpose, full knowledge and help) -- have You found the law requiring you to file income taxes??

God bless diligent devoted Americans living lawfully in Amerika,